Legal Opinion

In re Glasberg

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 8, 1912No. 167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In the matter of Morris Glasberg, Samuel Glasberg, and Darcy Devine, individually and as members of the firm of Glasberg Bros. & Devine, bankrupts. Appeal by Samuel Glasberg from an order dismissing his application for discharge.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, Circuit Judge.

It appears that the bankrupt, Samuel Glasberg, filed his application for. a discharge within the time limited by section 14 of the Bankruptcy Act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 550 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427]). No specifications against the discharge have been filed by creditors. The petition for a discharge was dismissed on the sole ground that the “bankrupt, Samuel Glasberg, was guilty of unreasonable delay and gross laches in bringing on his petition for discharge to be heard before this court.”

The record shows that the bankrupt had been declared in contempt of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Cage Cotton Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929
  2. Schmelz Liquidating Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  3. In re ReislerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  4. In re WhittakerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API