Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Summer
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 2010No. G041906PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
Particularly in these days of rampant foreclosures and short sales, “[t]he manner in which California’s licensed real estate brokers and salesmen conduct business is a matter of public interest and concern. [Citations.]” (Wilson v. Lewis (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 802, 805-806 [165 Cal.Rptr. 396].) When the real estate professionals involved in the purchase and sale of a residential' property do not disclose to the buyer that the property is so greatly overencumbered that it is almost certain clear title cannot be conveyed for the agreed-upon price, the transaction is doomed to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Merrill v. BuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Reed v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peake v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Arce v. Childrens Hospital Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Lopez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.