Legal Opinion

Eugene L. Curtis and Eileen Curtis v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1981No. 79-1679PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Chief Judge.

This action was commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado based on diversity jurisdiction. It is a strict liability claim arising from a one-car accident in which plaintiff Eugene Curtis sustained several serious injuries. Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied and the case was submitted to a jury which found for the plaintiffs. General Motors’ motions for judgment n. o. v., or in the alternative, for a new trial were denied and this appeal followed.

Plaintiffs’ theory of the case was that the automobile, a 1973 Chevrolet Blazer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Union Supply Co. v. PustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Dreisonstok v. VolkswagenwerkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  4. Dyson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Bradford v. Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air Brake Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Moe v. Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet AviationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Kudlacek v. Fiat S.P.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Gregory Allen Harvey, by and Through His Legal Guardian, Lyle Dean Harvey v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API