In Re: The Matter of the Paternity of S.C.: K.C. (Appellant), and C.C. (Appellee), and B.H. (Appellee-Intervenor)
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
In In re the Matter of the Paternity of S.C, we affirmed the Hancock Circuit Court’s grant of B.H.’s Verified Petition for Relief from Judgment for Fraud Upon the Court. We need not undertake an exhaustive recitation of the underlying facts. To summarize, C.C., with K.C.’s (Mother’s) cooperation, 1 filed an action in Hancock County that sought, in part, an adjudication that C.C. was the biological father of S.C. This action was filed while another paternity action was pending in Fayette Circuit Court, the latter instituted by B.H. claiming that he was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by4 opinions
- John P. Schaub v. The Estate of Edward G. Schaub and David Schaub, Personal RepresentativeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- R.L.N. v. P.A.B., M.J.B., and C.L.B., Jr. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Sandhu Petroleum Corp. No. 3 v. SBJ Petroleum No. 1, LLC SBJ Petroleum No. 3 LLC, Michael A. Jarard Corinth Bishop (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Thomas Zachary v. Amanda Suzanne Nesbitt (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020