Legal Opinion

People v. Capuzi

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 4, 1999No. 2-98-1031, 2-98-1034, 2-98-1035 consPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BOWMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendants, Louis Capuzi, Paul Koroluk, and Frank Perez, were indicted for residential burglary (720 ILCS 5/19 — 3(a) (West 1996)). They moved to quash search warrants for their residences and to suppress evidence seized pursuant to the search warrants. The trial court granted defendants’ motions on the grounds that the descriptions of property to be seized contained in the warrants were too general and that the judge who issued the warrants was not a neutral and detached magistrate. The State filed a certificate of impairment, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. HollowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. PrallIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. HolmesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. People v. BatacAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. McCartyIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. CauseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. ElderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. People v. McGregoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. People v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API