Sukosky v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Philadelphia and Reading Coal and Iron Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 20th day of May, 1919, denying defendant’s motion to set aside the service of a summons and complaint herein, as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 14th day of June, 1919.
1Opinion of the Court
Page, J.:
The complaint is not printed in the papers on appeal. The affidavit of the defendant’s attorney states that the action is to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while working as a miner in one of the defendant’s mines in the State of Pennsylvania. The defendant is a Pennsylvania corporation. The facts concerning the plaintiff’s residence are not stated in the record; we will, therefore, assume for the purpose of this appeal that he is a resident of this State.
After the decision by the Court of Appeals of the case of Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading C. &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Flexner v. FarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Bradford Co. v. DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Helme v. BuckelewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- State of Colorado v. HarbeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919