Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Burleigh

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 24, 1901No. 373PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal taken from a decision of the district court for the Massachusetts district, sitting in bankruptcy. We have been referred to Chatfield v. O’Dwyer, 42 C. C.A. 30, 101 Fed. 797, decided by the circuit court of appeals for the Eighth circuit on May 21, 1900, and In re Roche, 42 C. C. A. 115, 101 Fed. 956, decided by the circuit court of appeals for the Fifth circuit on May 1, 1900. Each court apparently considered the case without any information that the other court had the same, or a similar, question before it. Certainly, neither case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Bryan v. BernheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. McCormick Harvesting MacHine Co. v. AultmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Chatfield v. O'DwyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  5. Smith v. Mortgage & Debenture Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. In re LewensohnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  3. Fred Reuping Leather Co. v. Fort Greene Nat. Bank of Brooklyn, N. Y.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. Crocker v. ChakosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  5. In Re American Fidelity CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API