Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Hosmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order discontinuing an action of replevin. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

William H. Saunders gave mortgages upon personal property in the following order: (1) to George W. Saunders; (2) to John J. Closs; (8) to Hincks & Johnson. George W. Saunders took possession under his mortgage. Hincks & Johnson then agreed with Closs to advance the expenses and foreclose the Closs mortgage, the net proceeds, after paying for foreclosure, to be divided equally. Hincks & J ohnson thereupon hired Fowler to seize the property under the Closs mortgage, which he did. George W. Saunders thereupon brought replevin, making Closs and Fowler defendants. An arrangement was thereafter…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chapelle v. WebsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Saunders v. ClossMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API