Legal Opinion

Pack v. Prudential Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 9, 1916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Bóyd .Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll.

Affirming.

In March, 1913, Garfield Pack secured an accident and health insurance policy in the Prudential Casualty Co., with a death benefit of one thousand dollars. The beneficiary of the policy was his wife, the appellant, Julia Pack.

The policy stipulated that it insured Garfield Pack “against death or loss of time on account of disability resulting directly and independently of all other causes, from bodily injuries sustained through external, violent and accidental means. * * *” And under the heading “special death indemnity” there was this clause:

“If…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. BethelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Smith v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. American Accident Co. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Richards v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Goethe v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Elsey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. CashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API