Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Rodgers

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and to strike out certain of its paragraphs under rule 103. In 1909 the defendant Helen M. Rodgers, her husband, James M. Rodgers, against whom she had brought an action for divorce then pending, and the latter’s father, John C. Rodgers, entered into an agreement whereby this defendant withdrew her divorce action and agreed to resume marital relations with her husband, in consideration of which her husband and his father agreed, among other things, to pay her $300 per month “ so long as she shall live,”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Power v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Rodgers v. . RodgersNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Rodgers v. . RodgersNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Hewitt v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API