Legal Opinion

Lew Jim v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1895No. 186PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. This was an application by Lew Jim for a writ of habeas corpus to obtain his discharge from the custody of the collector of the port of San Francisco. The district court remanded the petitioner to the custody of the collector. Petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

McKENNA, Circuit Judge.

The appellant is a subject of the emperor of China, and claims to have been a resident Chinese person in San Francisco, and partner in the Chinese firm of Bing Kee, dealers in Japanese fancy goods, 619 Dupont street, his interest being §1,000, and that he departed for China September 6, 1892, for a temporary visit, and that he returned on the 1st day of April, 1894, to resume his business as a member of said ürm. The collector of the port would not permit him to land, and he applied to the district court for writ of habeas corpus, which was issued, and the matter…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Yong YewDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1897
  2. Lai Moy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
  3. United States v. Sing LeeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1896
  4. Mar Bing Guey v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1899
  5. Jew Sing v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API