Legal Opinion
Olson v. 625 Ocean Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants 625 Ocean Company, Harry D. Silver-stein, and Ronald Dushame, sued herein as Ron “Doe,” appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated April 19, 2006, as granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the complaint to assert a claim against them based on the theory of res ipsa loquitur.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is an inference arising from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weeden v. Armor Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Ladd v. Hudson Valley Ambulance ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Davis v. Vantage Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Porter v. Huntington HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Silberman v. LazarowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wicks v. Leemilt's Petroleum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Wicks v. Leemilt's Petroleum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013