Legal Opinion

State v. Broome

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On motion to quash indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

*116The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The defendant' was indicted in the Hudson County Oyer and Terminer for misdemeanor in office, and, the indictment having been removed into this court, he now moves to quash it.

“The state claims,” to quote from the brief of;the learned prosecutor of the pleas, “ that the defendant was at the time the holder of an office, and that he was guilty of misconduct in that office. If the facts do not constitute this offence, then no offence was committed by him.”

The office which the indictment avers he held was that of “architect to supervise the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GermaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. State ex rel. Lewis v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  3. Cramer v. Water CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kendall v. ColeNevada Supreme Court · 1915
  2. McAvoy v. Inhabitants of City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Borough of Park Ridge v. BellavignaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API