Legal Opinion

Ganiev v. Nazi

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 18, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously modified by providing that (1) appellant’s motion to serve an amended answer so as to allege the incapacity of the infant plaintiff, Eldar Ganiev, to commence the action and, upon said amendment, dismissing Eldar Ganiev’s action is denied on condition that plaintiffs, within 90 days of the date of the order hereon, obtain new representation and apply to the trial court for the appointment of a guardian in accordance with article 12 of the CPLR, otherwise, motion granted, defendant’s answer deemed amended, and action by Eldar Ganiev dismissed;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Pessoni v. RabkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Shaikh v. LaToya WaitersNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Sidor v. ZuhoskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re H. ChildrenNew York City Family Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alcantara v. MendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Dorsainvil v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Abreu v. AlvarezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
  4. De Valdez v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API