Legal Opinion

Stowe v. Belfast Sav. Bank

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine

Decided November 23, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was an action at law by William E. Stowe and others against the Belfast Savings Bank, involving the validity of an attachment, and a sale thereunder of certain land claimed by plaintiffs as trustees under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, made by the attachment debtor.

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, District Judge.

This is a real action. The plea is, did not disseise. The parties submit the case to the court upon the following stipulation and agreed statement:

“As there is no controversy between the parties as to the facts in this case, it is agreed-that the case may be submitted to the court upon the subjoined statement of facts, which may be treated by the court as the findings of a jury. To the rulings of the court upon the facts thus presented, each party reserves the right of exception and appeal by writ of error to the circuit court of appeals.
“Facts: The property in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Brooks v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  4. Bucher v. Cheshire RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Carroll v. Lessee of CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York Trust Co. v. Island Oil & Transport CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Converse v. MearsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API