Stowe v. Belfast Sav. Bank
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine
This was an action at law by William E. Stowe and others against the Belfast Savings Bank, involving the validity of an attachment, and a sale thereunder of certain land claimed by plaintiffs as trustees under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, made by the attachment debtor.
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, District Judge.
This is a real action. The plea is, did not disseise. The parties submit the case to the court upon the following stipulation and agreed statement:
“As there is no controversy between the parties as to the facts in this case, it is agreed-that the case may be submitted to the court upon the subjoined statement of facts, which may be treated by the court as the findings of a jury. To the rulings of the court upon the facts thus presented, each party reserves the right of exception and appeal by writ of error to the circuit court of appeals.
“Facts: The property in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Brooks v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Bucher v. Cheshire RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Carroll v. Lessee of CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New York Trust Co. v. Island Oil & Transport CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Converse v. MearsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1908