Legal Opinion

Southeast Colorado Power Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 12, 1967No. 21694Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

Mr. Justice McWilliams:

In its Petition for Rehearing Southeast asserts that the so-called “Gentlemen’s Agreement” between Southeast and Lamar is an enforceable contract and that this contract in and of itself is dispositive of the entire case. In thus asserting Southeast relies on Intermountain Rural Electric Association, Inc. v. Colorado Central Power Co. 135 Colo. 42, 307 P.2d 1101.

In our view the instant case is quite different from the Intermountain case in that the contract there under con*98sideration was found to be one which in nowise tended to impair the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Intermountain Rural Electric Ass'n v. Colorado Central Power Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API