Sepulveda v. Perez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1058“The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family Court, and that court’s determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed if supported by the record” (Matter of DosReis v Rousseau, 85 AD3d 1028, 1029 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Richardson v Richardson, 80 AD3d 32 [2010]; see Matter of Luke v Luke, 72 AD3d 689 [2010]). Here, the Family Court was presented with sharply conflicting testimony as to whether the father harassed the mother. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilson v. McGlincheyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Richardson v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hom v. ZulloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Perez v. SepulvedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Luke v. LukeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Streat v. StreatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Amato v. AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Alonso v. PerdueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Lannaman v. MinusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Krisztina K. v. John S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.