In re the Claim of Sampson

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 21, 1990, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely.

The only reason the Unemployment Insurance Appeal *880Board reopened claimant’s case was to decide if there had been any violations of the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment of Municipal Labor Comm, v Sitkin (683 F Supp 353). Having found none, the Board adhered to its prior decision denying claimant’s request for unemployment insurance benefits. On this appeal, given…