Legal Opinion

Hardwick v. Royal Food Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, Greene county. Action Tby John Hardwick against the Royal Food Company of New Jersey and others. From an order confirming the report of a referee, Thomas E. Ferrier, as trustee, a claimant of the surplus money, appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtMayham, P. J.

A sale under a judgment of foreclosure in the above-entitled action on a mortgage on real estate, of which the defendant had the legal title, subject to the mortgage, was perfected on the 18th of April, 1893, leaving a surplus of $893.76, which was deposited in the county treasury. The mortgage on which this foreclosure was had was dated March 31, 1890, and recorded May 5 of the same year. The premises covered by the mortgage were conveyed to the defendant April 1, 1891. August 10, 1891, the Posts, as partners, filed a mechanic’s lien against the premises sold on such foreclosure sale, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albany City Savings Institution v. . BurdickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. In Re the Distribution of the Proceeds of the Sale of the Real Estate of StilwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. McAllister v. CaseNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Regal Lumber Co. v. Buck, New York County Courts1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API