Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ryan Mortgage Investors v. Berton Land Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 1, 1977No. 7962Published

1DissentDies, Chief Justice

With respect, I dissent. The trial court had before him probative evidence that Berton entered into the deed of trust with Ryan only on the assurance by Ryan that it *365would and could finance the development of the some 1500 acres on Lake Conroe; that at that time it knew it could not and would not carry this out; to Berton’s damage. The representation was made in Montgomery County. Under these circumstances venue was properly laid in Montgomery County under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. art. 1995 § 7 (1964). See “Survey of Texas Law for the Year 1948”, 3 Sw.L.J. 386 (1949); McDonald v. Peebles, 267 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Custom Leasing, Inc. v. Texas Bank & Trust Co. of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Great American Mortgage Investors v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. McDonald v. PeeblesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Neon Signs & Service, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API