Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Chambers
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided December 5, 1984No. 69,260PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This is a post-conviction habeas corpus application filed pursuant to Art. 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. The application was ordered filed and set for submission “on the allegations that the admission of Dr. Grigson’s testimony violated the applicant’s rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution.”
Petitioner was convicted of capital murder and the death penalty was assessed. On appeal the conviction was affirmed. Chambers v. State, 568 S.W.2d 313. It is now contended that the psychiatric testimony used during the punishment phase of the trial was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Goff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Rabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.