Legal Opinion
Gardner v. G.D. Barri & Associates Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 12, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01518Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Aaron Gardner, No. CV-20-01518-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 G.D. Barri & Associates Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Before the Court is Defendant G.D. Barri & Associates Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “G.D. 16 Barri”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Doc. 17.) Defendant argues that Plaintiff 17 Aaron Gardner’s (“Plaintiff” or “Gardner”) one claim, for failure to pay overtime under 18 the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), fails on the pleadings because Plaintiff was a 19 “highly compensated employee”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Parrino v. FHP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.