Legal Opinion

City of Pocatello v. Anderton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1984No. 14531Published

1Opinion of the Court

679 P.2d 647 (1984)

106 Idaho 370

CITY OF POCATELLO, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Cleve D. and Marilyn ANDERTON; the Lockhart Co.; Bannock County, a political subdivision of Idaho; and a tract of land more particularly described in the complaint, Defendants, and

Bardell J. and Mae M. Anderton, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 14531.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

March 29, 1984.

James E. Harward, Pocatello, for defendants-appellants.

William L. Herrington, Moscow, for plaintiff-respondent.

HUNTLEY, Justice.

This appeal presents two issues for resolution: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying a request for jury…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. LaMereIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Roth v. HyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Stephens v. KastenIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. YoderIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API