Van Alstine v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArthur Ervin Blauvelt, J.
Plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring that she is entitled to one half of the proceeds of a life insurance policy issued by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company under a group contract with Eastman Kodak Company, which company was the employer of the deceased insured Victor Perctval Van Alstine.
The action was instituted by plaintiff against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, the Eastman Kodak Company and Richard Frederick Van Alstine. However, subsequently and pursuant to stipulation of all parties, an order was entered in this action discontinuing and dismissing the action as against *960t…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Luhrs v. . LuhrsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Clark v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Lahey v. . LaheyNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Greenfield v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Considine v. ConsidineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knickerbocker v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- In re the Estate of WolfeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
- Custer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1968