Legal Opinion

Cherdak v. McKirdy

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 27, 2020No. 8:19-cv-01246Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ERIK B. CHERDAK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. TDC-19-1246 SEAN L. McKIRDY and ROBERT NUTINI, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Erik B. Cherdak has filed this self-represented civil action against Defendants Sean L. McKirdy and Robert Nutini asserting a variety of state law claims. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. Having reviewed the filings, the Court finds that no hearing is necessary. See D. Md. Local R. 105.6. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API