Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Runyan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1999No. 98-2541Published

1Dissent

Judith Nicely and John Bessey, Judges,

dissenting.

We would affirm the Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Recommendations of the Panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline as filed on December 1, 1998. The panel could best determine the credibility of the witnesses regarding the facts. The facts are not disputed, as respondent states in the transcript that the newspaper articles were accurate regarding his statement “I would run a court that views convicted felons from the standpoint that they are going to be incarcerated.”

The issue in this case is one’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Ernest N. Morial v. Judiciary Commission of the State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Nicholson v. Judicial Retirement & Removal CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KaiserWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In re Complaint Against Judge HarperOhio Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API