Legal Opinion

Carlisle Gas & Water Co. v. Carlisle Water Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1897No. Appeal, No. 22PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 22, Jan. T., 1897, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Cumberland Co., June T., 1896, No. 6, on bill in equity. Bill in equity to restrain the construction of water works. Before Biddle, P. J. The facts appear by tbe opinion of the Supreme Court. The court below granted a preliminary injunction which it subsequently continued. Brror assigned was above decree.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

The parties to this suit are not correctly given in appellants’ paper-book and history of the case. In both, the plaintiff and defendant-are the two corporations, and the only parties litigant, *20while in fact joined with the Carlisle Gas & Water Company as plaintiff, is a taxpayer of the borough of Carlisle, and presumably a representative of other taxpayers. Therefore, we must assume that the complainants represent both the private and municipal corporations’ interest, so far as the latter can be represented by one of its members, undisputably acting for himself and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. City of MeadvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Metzger v. Borough of Beaver FallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carlisle Gas & Water Co. v. Carlisle BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Carlisle Gas & Water Co. v. Carlisle Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API