Legal Opinion

Saranac & Lake Placid Railroad v. Arnold

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to discontinue.

1Opinion of the CourtGildebsleeve, J.

This is an application made by Messrs. Forster & Spier, as attorneys for the plaintiff, for an order discontinuing this action, without costs to either side. Both of the defendants, i. e., Charles E. Arnold and Alfred J. Voyer, have given their consents in writing, duly acknowledged, to such, discontinuance, without costs. The motion, however, is opposed by Messrs. Straley, Hasbrouck & Schloeder, attorneys herein for the defendant Yoyer, and by Mr. Thomas M. Rowlette, attorney herein for the defendant Arnold, on the ground that costs should be paid to the said attorneys as a condition for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Exhibition Co. v. CraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. White v. SumnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gildersleeve v. Reitz, New York County Courts1913
  2. Saranac & Lake Placid Railroad v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API