Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1939No. 27238PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Relator's petition in mandamus filed in the Court of Appeals attacks the constitutionality of Section 1465-44a, General Code. That statute creates four boards of claims with power to investigate, hear and determine such claims as are referred to them by the Industrial. Commission of Ohio. Such boards of claims have no jurisdiction over claims for additional awards under Section 35, Article II of the Constitution of Ohio, or applications for rehearing under Section 1465-90, General Code. The statute goes on to provide that "the Industrial Commission shall provide for each such boards [sic] of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fulton Foundry & MacHine Co. v. MorseOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. State ex rel. Gabbard v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State ex rel. Michaels v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API