Legal Opinion

State v. Horn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1989No. WD 41303PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

A jury found defendant Tommie Eugene Horn guilty of the sale of a schedule II controlled substance in violation of Missouri law. He appeals alleging that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence in that evidence did not warrant the submission of the case to the jury.

On review, we consider the evidence, both direct an circumstantial, and all reasonable inferences generated by that evidence, in the light most favorable to the verdict and disregard all evidence and inferences to the contrary. State v. Rodden, 728 S.W.2d 212, 213…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. FrancoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. State v. GuinanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shale Royalty LLC v. MMGJ Arkansas Upstream LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API