Legal Opinion

Harley v. Moncrief

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1935No. 24423PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The record discloses that in July, 1931, the plaintiff in error, A.N. Harley, was the owner of approximately 58 head of cattle, which, on July 26, 1931, the day being Sunday, at about one o'clock, and while said cattle were in charge of Jess Mauldin, an agent of Harley, broke and entered the premises of the defendant in error, Clinton Moncrief, and did some damage to his growing crops. The defendant in error, Moncrief, seized the cattle, and shortly thereafter the said Mauldin returned and was notified that the cattle had been seized and were being held until the damages done by them were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newland v. HattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Daniels v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCown v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API