Legal Opinion

United States v. Vieira-Candelario

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided August 7, 1992No. Cr. No. 92-044 PPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETTINE, Senior District Judge.

The government charged Aurelio Vieira-Candelario with violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326— unlawful reentry into the United States after a prior order of deportation without first seeking the permission of the Attor*118ney General of the United States.1 The defendant filed two motions with the Court asking for essentially the same relief: a motion to quash the indictment and a motion to dismiss. Both motions collaterally attack the deportation order upon which the charge and indictment are premised. For the reasons discussed below, both motions are denied.

I

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. MARINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. Roberto Encarnacion-GalvezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Jose Alfredo Colindres-Aguilar v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Vieira CandelarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Vieira-CandelarioDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993
  3. United States v. Vieira CandelarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Zhen v. DoeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API