Legal Opinion

Shoaf v. Bringle

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice BurNett

This proceeding is brought by a contestant, Stanley Shoaf, under Sections 2123-2129, inclusive, of the Code, against V. W. Bringle and the election commissioners of Tipton County, to contest his election to the office of County Judge of Tipton County, Tennessee.

The bill is drafted so that it states a double barrel proposition. It is brought under two aspects of an action of the kind, one, to have the complainant, defendant in error, declared the party elected and, two, that the election held was so permeated with fraud that the entire election is void. Suits of the kind, stating both aspects…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maloney v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State Ex Rel. Davis v. KivettTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Nelson v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State Ex Rel. Robinson v. HutchesonTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. McQueenTennessee Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Forbes v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. King v. Sevier County Election CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  3. Blackwood v. HollingsworthTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Shoaf v. BringleTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Lee v. TuttleTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API