Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1997No. 20885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals from a judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage. His point on appeal states:

Trial court erroneously applied the law in its characterization of the parties^] *573property and trial court’s division of marital property was an abuse of discretion and erroneous application of the law and as a result did not equitably divide the property-

It is apparent that this point does not comply with Rule 84.04. A point relied on must contain a concise statement of the challenged ruling of the trial court, rule of law which the court should have applied, and evidentiary basis on which the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FludMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. McMillan v. WellsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Shellenberger v. ShellenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Sigan v. SiganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cline v. TeasdaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. In Re Marriage of PerkelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. S.M.R. ex rel. Ryan v. McDonald's Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API