Legal Opinion

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1979PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hopkins, J. P.

The defendant’s chief complaint against his conviction is the failure of the court to charge that one of the prosecution’s witnesses was an accomplice of the defendant, and that under the statute the testimony of an accomplice must be corrobo*749rated (see CPL 60.22). No request was made of the court for that charge by the defendant and no exception was taken by the defendant to the court’s failure to charge in accordance with the statute.

We hold that the failure of the court to charge the jury as required by statute is reversible error. Hence, the judgment must…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. DuncanNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. BaschNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Linsday v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. StrawderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. People v. LeonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. ArnottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. FaceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API