Martinez-Vazquez v. Saul
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMOR M.-V., Case No.: 20-cv-2084-DEB 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR 14 ATTORNEY FEES KILOLO KIJAKAZI, 15 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. [DKT. NO. 20] 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees (“Motion”) 18 pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b)(1) and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. No. 20. For the 19 reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiff Amor M. filed this action seeking review of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Chapa v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011