Legal Opinion
United States v. McDonnell
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided July 20, 1970No. Cr. 01482PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION FOR SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE AND MOTION FOR RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY
URBOM, District Judge.
The defendant is charged in two counts with entry and attempt at entry of the Bank of Brady, Brady, Nebraska, the deposits of which were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. He has filed a motion to suppress as evidence certain physical objects, most of which were discovered in an automobile as a result of a search warrant, and has filed a motion for the return to him of such objects. The facts developed at the hearing on the motions are as follows:
Sometime…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bies v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. DavenportAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. WedgeworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. VrtiskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.