Sloppy v. State

Lee Sloppy appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He raises two claims, arguing in both that his written sentences do not reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing. The posteonviction court summarily denied his motion, but in doing so it only addressed the second of the two claims, apparently overlooking the first. 1 Although we affirm the denial of the second claim without discussion, we reverse the denial of the motion and remand for the court to consider Mr. Sloppy’s first claim,…