Legal Opinion
City of Atlanta v. Hines
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 7, 1929No. 19382PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
Clarence Hines brought his action for damages against the City of Atlanta, the court overruled a general demurrer to the petition, and the defendant excepted to this ruling. The petition, addressed to the superior court of Eulton county, follows: “The petition of Clarence Hines shows to the court as follows:
“1. That the City of Atlanta, the defendant herein, is a municipal corporation located in said State and county.
“2. That pursuant to section 910 of the revised Code of Georgia, petitioner has presented in writing more than thirty days prior to this date to the governing authorities of said…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Pause v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- City of Atlanta v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Moore v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- City of Atlanta v. WordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Waters v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- City of Rome v. LecroyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939