Commonwealth v. Jones
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Manderino,
This is an appeal by the prosecution from an order granting the appellee, Otis Jones, a new trial following his convictions involving murder in the first degree, robbery and conspiracy. A court en banc granted the new trial because the trial court failed to give points for charge requested by the appellee, Otis Jones. “The law is well settled that the grant or denial of a motion for a new trial will not be reversed by tMs Court, unless [the order of the court en banc] was a clear abuse of discretion or an error of law [citations omitted].” Commonwealth v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DeitrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Commonwealth v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Bentivoglio v. RalstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. PalermoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth v. DanzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ManigaultSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. CristinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.