Legal Opinion

Consolidated Water Co. v. City of Talco

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1938No. 5390PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

On July 23, 1937, appellee filed its application for and was granted a temporary injunction against appellants prohibiting them “from selling, marketing or delivering through their pipe lines in said City of Talco any water to any person, firm or corporation, within the corporate limits of the City of Talco, Texas, pending a hearing and final determination of this suit.” In its petition, upon which the temporary injunction was granted, appellee alleged that it was a municipal corporation; that appellants were an association or partnership doing business under the trade-name of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Paris v. SturgeonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Jacksonville Ice & Electric Co. v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Scranton Elec. L. & H. Co. v. Scranton Ill. H. & P. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. Bexar Metropolitan Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. West Texas Utilities Company v. City of BairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. City of Lubbock v. Phillips Petroleum Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  4. City of Baird v. West Texas Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API