Legal Opinion

State v. Crow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 31, 2018No. A162791PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

*197Defendant appeals a judgment revoking her probation. Defendant assigns error to the trial court's imposition of $110 in court-appointed attorney fees and a $25 probation-violation fee. Defendant argues that the trial court erred when it ordered her to pay those fees because the court entered them in the judgment without first announcing in court that it would impose them. Defendant requests that we remand the case for resentencing. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing attorney fees for the first time in the judgment. However, the state argues that, because it agrees with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ZoskeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. ZoskeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API