Legal Opinion

Stott v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1983No. C-1347Published

1Dissent 1

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

2Dissent · RobertsonRobertson, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The language of the Workers’ Compensation Act clearly states that “Upon settlement of all cases where the carrier admits liability for the death but a dispute exists as to the proper beneficiary ... attorney’s fees shall be paid periodically and not in a lump sum.” Tex. Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 8306 § 8(d). Counsel for Mary Stott reiterated both in the trial court and before this Court that TEIA admitted liability for the death benefits and the case was tried only as a dispute between the beneficiaries. This is precisely the situation contemplated…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldman v. TorresTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. Division of World MissionsTexas Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API