Andruszewski v. Cantello
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In this personal injury action arising out of an automobile collision, defendant, Angelo J. Cantello, moved for an order precluding the testimony of plaintiffs treating psychologists, Drs. Appel and Blumetti, on the ground that plaintiff had failed to produce their complete files on plaintiff. Supreme Court conditionally ordered the preclusion of their testimony unless they produced, within 30 days, their complete patient files, including certain enumerated tests that had been administered to plaintiff, along with test books, instructions,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- In re U. S. Pioneer Electronics Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Nitz v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Vatel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Beard v. Peconic Foam Insulation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gadley v. U.S. Sugar Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Marable v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Green v. Kingdom Garage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- MCLEOD, NATHAN v. TACCONE, MARK J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Jessica H. v. SpagnoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.