Legal Opinion

McNeil v. Dixon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 30, 2004PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the de*482fendant Treena Dixon appeals, and the defendants Leonid Kurlat and Boris Knopp separately appeal, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated May 30, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, and treated as one for leave to renew, but which was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue the defendants’ prior separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Crespo v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Lalli v. TamasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Andre v. SeemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gorden v. TibulcioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Rivera v. Glen Oaks Village Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Ahmed v. PannoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Luckey v. BauchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Shields v. KleinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API