Legal Opinion

Dunkleman v. Meadows of Highland Home Owners Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motions granted and complaint dismissed. Mem*990orandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. At approximately 7:50 a.m., plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on a patch of black ice that had formed overnight on the driveway outside 142 Bridle Path. Defendants established by proof in admissible form that they had no actual or constructive notice of the icy patches on the driveway (see, Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972; Arcuri v Vitolo, 196 AD2d 519) and plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Arcuri v. VitoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Wright v. Fay's Drugs Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Evans v. Wegmans Food & Pharmacy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API