Legal Opinion
Trodglen v. Hastings (In Re Trodglen)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
Decided June 16, 1993No. 19-12686PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ADVERSARY COMPLAINT
ROBERT A. MARK, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Debtor filed this adversary proceeding to determine whether the Defendants, Linda Blastings and Carol Henley (the “Judgment Creditors”) hold a claim in this bankruptcy case secured by the stock in Trodglen Paving, Inc. The stock is 100% owned by the Debtor and is thus property of this estate.
The Judgment Creditors filed a motion to dismiss. They argue that their judgment lien was perfected by docketing and recording a writ of execution with the Sheriff of Indian River…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Love v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1851
- Elizabeth K. Knapp v. Walter P. McFarland Defendant-Appellee-Appellant, Sheriff of the City of New York, Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Flagship State Bank of Jacksonville v. CarantzasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hastings v. FurrDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
- Mukamal v. Lima (In Re All Star Mortgage Financial Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2009
- Six v. Henderson (In Re Six)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Motiva Performance Engineering, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2021