Coak v. Rebber
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
Bernard Coak appeals from a judgment of garnishment rendered in favor of Erma J. Rebber, his former wife, on her verified motion for proceedings supplemental. 1 Al though Coak raises twelve issues on appeal, many of his contentions are interrelated. We will, therefore, take the liberty of fashioning a more workable format for our discussion. Ind.Rules of Procedure, Appellate Rule 8.3(A)(7). In essence, Coak asks:(1) Was there sufficient evidence for the court to have set aside the stock transfer as being fraudulent and thereby order that the monthly installment payments were…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arnold v. DirrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Storm v. MarsischkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ligon Specialized Hauler, Inc. v. HottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mitchell v. Godsey, AdministratrixIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
- Baker v. POWELLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunson v. DunsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- K.S. v. R.S.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Mishawaka Brass Manufacturing Inc. v. Milwaukee Valve Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Poznic v. Porter County Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Matter of US Marketing Concepts, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.