Vaughn v. State

Carlisle, Judge.

1. This is the second appearance of this case in this court. On its previous appearance, the conviction of the defendant was reversed because of the admission of irrelevant and prejudicial evidence, this court holding, however, that the evidence authorized the verdict of guilty. Vaughn v. State, 97 Ga. App. 406, 409 (103 S. E. 2d 101). When the case was tried again, the evidence was substantially the same as that set out in the opinion there, the irrelevant evidence being omitted, of course. Under these circumstances, this court cannot say that the evidence on this trial did…