Legal Opinion

Sandra Trusty Runge v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1976No. 75-1702PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

This is a suit on double indemnity clauses of two insurance policies. On the date of his death, plaintiff’s husband, Wilbur L. Runge, Jr., was insured by Metropolitan under two policies with a total face value of $19,000. Metropolitan paid the face amounts but declined to pay double on plaintiff’s contention that death resulted from injuries sustained “solely through violent, external and accidental means” within the meaning of the double indemnity clauses of the policies. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan. We affirm.

I

Sandra Trusty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Smith v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  3. Wooden v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Todd v. AIG Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. MAMSI Life & Health Insurance v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Julia Brumfield Sims v. Monumental General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Sigler v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1981
  5. Kennedy v. Washington National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API